|
|
 |
The Fallacy of Expanding Redevelopment in North County, and How this Expansion is being used to build infrastructure
for future Large Developers, Michael Hohl, Big George and John Serpa.
A Bribe By Another Name
BY PAUL BROWN , Southern Nevada Director of PLAN
Six years ago, I missed a golden opportunity. Back then, a Clark County official called me to a private one-on-one meeting
in his office. He had in his hand a copy of our Jackpot report, which tracked campaign contributions to state legislators.
He
asked if the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada could do a Jackpot-style report on the Clark County Commission. He
suspected special interests were giving campaign donations to commissioners right before crucial votes (for example, before
votes for controversial zoning variances).
Unfortunately, I didn't have the time to do a local Jackpot report, which
takes hundreds of hours to compile. I wish I had found the time. The G-Sting scandal is all about so-called campaign contributions.
Former
Clark County Commissioner Lance Malone and a couple of San Diego city councilmen were recently found guilty of federal political
corruption charges. Malone, working for strip club owner Michael Galardi, worked out a tit-for-tat deal with the councilmen.
He funneled campaign contributions to them and in return, they promised to weaken the rules regulating Galardi's strip club.
San Diego jurors decided the campaign contributions were actually bribes.
But when the trial of Malone and former Clark
County Commissioners Dario Herrera and Mary Kincaid-Chauncey comes to Las Vegas next year, don't necessarily expect guilty
verdicts. In Nevada, if it looks like a bribe and it smells like a bribe, then it's probably a legal campaign contribution.
Reforms to our weak campaign finance laws are long overdue.
For example, in San Diego, campaign contributions are limited
to $250 from a single person or company. In Nevada, you can give up to $5,000 in the primary and another $5,000 in the general
election. And, the law is so full of holes that you could drive the monorail through it. A single corporation can legally
give a candidate $100,000 or more. Special interests are not giving that kind of cash out of civic duty. They want something
in return.
Some people have criticized Malone's attorney, Dominic Gentile, for describing the $34,500 payoffs to the
San Diego councilmen as "chump change." But in the high-finance world of campaign contributions, Gentile is absolutely right.
And
who gives big-time money to county commission campaigns? Not strip club owners.
Developers give hundreds of thousands
of dollars to county commissioners, much more than topless nightclub owners give. But going after the developers is not as
sexy a story as going after strip club owners.
G-Sting makes it clear that our campaign finance laws need to be reformed.
We should make it a criminal offense for a county commissioner to receive a campaign contribution right before a crucial vote.
The current system is nothing but legalized bribery.
We should close loopholes so that companies cannot go over the
already too-high campaign contribution limit of $5,000. We should demand that our state disclosure laws mirror the stricter
federal laws.
In Nevada, we're following the titillating sleaze, not the big-time money from developers and others.
And that is a mistake. It is another golden opportunity missed.
Paul Brown is the Southern Nevada Director
of the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada.
|
 |
|
|
The Field of Dreams Continues!
Well, The commissioners wouldn't listen to reason and in December 0f 2006 they approved the
$24,700,000.00 in redevelopment dollars for Jay Timon and his Riverwood Redevelopment LLC.
Those commissioners voting for this boondougal were, Doug Johnson, Kelly Kite, Jim Baushke
and Tim Smith. Well at least Smith is gone but we probably are doing worse with his replacement. Kite and Baushke are
not running in the next election so we nrrd to help Dave Brady out by electing some commisioners who are a little smarter
then the crop we will be replacing.
The dream continues for Mr. Baer as he will probably get a substantial portion of the $24,700,000.00.
That's $500.00 from every man, woman and child in Douglas County. This to a man and organization who had been turned
down in most of the counties in Northen Nevada. Oh ya, our money is being very wisely spent.
Why should we have to pay bribes to businesses who already have made it quite clear they want
to build in Douglas County? For that matter why are we paying any bribes?
Let's find candidates for the election in November 2008 who have some intelligence in the
area of business and finance. Let's find a few who will stand up to Dan Hollar and tell him like it is. "Dan, you always
over estimate revenue from these pipe dreams, and unde estimate the costs to the county. Shape up or find a job elsewhere."

We may make past editions of the newsletter
available for download.
Good Government doesn't just happen,
We need you and your input.
E:mail to gggdc2006@hotmail.com
|
|
|
 |